|
In Asia and many parts of Africa, there are countless different
languages and dialects, making it essential to have a common language for
effective communication. Without a shared language, individuals in foreign
countries may feel isolated and cut off from others, even with the help of
skilled interpreters. While English may be a viable option for a universal
language due to its widespread use, there are both pros and cons to consider.
English is spoken by more people in the world, aside from Chinese, and is the
national language for 290 million people. With English as the global language,
communication between countries would be more efficient, as it is spoken in
North America, Australia, New Zealand, Britain, and numerous other countries.
Additionally, due to colonization and the presence of English-speaking
individuals in Asia and Africa for over a century, many people in these regions
have a better command of English than Europeans have of Asian languages.
Moreover, the language of the modern world is rooted in science and technology,
necessitating new words to be added continually. Malay is a composite language
capable of assimilating new words to cover modern needs, but its limited number
of speakers makes communication beyond the region difficult. On the other hand,
nearly a billion people speak Chinese, but its use of characters and symbols and
its lack of familiarity to the world outside China make it difficult for
ordinary foreigners to learn.
English, therefore, remains a practical option as the global language,
especially since it is already used in international forums such as the
Commonwealth of Nations. Singapore, as a member of the Commonwealth, contributes
to shaping policies on world affairs using English as a common language.
Regardless of the national language, it is crucial to communicate thoughts,
words, and ideas effectively at all levels, and English can facilitate this need
for global communication. |
