title

Custom Search

 

[ Correct English | Common Errors |  | Sample Letters | Glossary of Correct Usage | Common Sentences | Q & A ]

[ English Compositions | High School Vocab | Words | Phrases | Celebrity | Poetry Corner | SPM essays ]

[ Literary English | Word Differentiation ]

Sponsored Links

<<Prev

Literary  English

Next>>

   
TOEFL Vocabulary
English Conversation
English Grammar
American Idioms
English Comprehension
English Summary
English News
Movie Reviews
 
Exploring the Impact of Mad Cow Disease
 
Among the various concerns raised by the discovery of mad cow disease at a dairy farm in Washington state, none seems to draw more attention than the issue surrounding ground beef, a quintessential component of the American diet—the hamburger. Meat derived from a single dairy cow infected with the disease found its way to eight western states and the US territory of Guam, where consumers unwittingly consumed it in the form of hamburgers.

The reason for such extensive contamination lies in the nature of ground beef itself. The meat, shaped into patties for cooking, is typically a blend of meat sourced from multiple animals, thereby increasing the likelihood of contamination.

Furthermore, ground beef can be sourced from various parts of the same cow, with some parts believed to be safer than others. It is within the cow's nervous system that the disease resides, although certain food safety officials assure consumers that the American meat-processing system takes precautions to keep brains and spinal cords out of the meat during the slaughtering process.

Unlike other food-related contaminations like E. coli, mad cow disease remains unaffected by cooking. Thus, whether the hamburger is rare or well-cooked, the risk remains the same. Additionally, irradiation, a method used to treat meat, also fails to eliminate the disease, rendering it ineffective in providing any guarantee. As such, the question arises—should consumers continue to enjoy their juicy hamburgers, or is it advisable to abstain from consuming them for a while?

In October 2002, the US Department of Agriculture implemented an organic labeling system, ensuring that consumers who opt for organic products are aware that the food was produced without the use of pesticides, hormones, antibiotics, irradiation, or genetic engineering. These standards are also applicable to imported foods. The stringent certification process and regular inspections conducted on organic farms minimize the risk of mad cow contamination in meat products originating from such sources. An animal becomes infected with mad cow disease when it consumes contaminated feed, typically containing brain and spinal cord tissue.

To obtain organic certification, cattle must be fed a vegetarian diet consisting of grass. Grains such as corn, barley, and soybeans may be included temporarily to enhance fat content. Growth hormones and antibiotics are strictly prohibited in their feed. Conversely, conventional cattle farms often include cattle blood, gelatin, fat or tallow, and milk protein in the cattle feed.

During times of crisis, knowing the origin and history of an animal becomes crucial. Organic farms are required to maintain meticulous records tracking each animal from birth or purchase. These records must include details of healthcare and any treatments administered to the animals. Annual inspections are conducted at feed mills, farms, and slaughterhouses to ensure compliance.

Given these requirements, organic beef commands a substantial price, often selling for more than twice the cost of conventional beef. An organic farmer commented, "Whenever there is a food-related disaster, whether it's due to E. coli or genetically engineered corn, there is a surge in sales of organic beef. People become more conscious of where their food originates during times of crisis."

Some experts express outrage at the slow response of the US government in addressing mad cow concerns, asserting that consumers should avoid ground beef altogether. A spokesperson emphasizes, "Consumers must take responsibility for their own safety since they are largely unaware of the origin of the ground beef available in their local supermarkets." A study even traced a single pound of ground beef back to 400 animals across six states.

Yet, there are those who argue that punishing the entire industry for an incident involving a single cow is unwarranted. They believe that completely avoiding ground meat is an overreaction and that the chances of infection remain minimal.
 
 
 

001    002    003    004    005    006    007    008    009    010    011    012    013    014    015    016    017    018    019    020    021    022    023    024    025    026    027    028    029    030    031    032    033    034    035    036    037    038    039    040    041    042    043    044    045    046    047    048    049    050    051    052    053    054    055    056    057    058    059    060    061    062    063    064    065    066    067    068    069    070    071    072    073    074

 
Sponsored Links
 
 
 
American Slang
English Proverbs
English Exercises
Common English mistakes
Ancient Chinese stories
Junior English essays
High School English essays
Lower Secondary English essays